FMCSA BASIC Score Hearing Sept. 13
Transport Topics Trucking Magazine
Originally posted at Transport Topics Magazine online.

By Timothy Cama – Washington D.C., Oct. 9 – A coalition of interest groups relied on faulty arguments that were often out of context and used little or no data in their objections to a recent truck driver hours-of-service rule that kept both the 11-hour workday and the 34-hour restart, American Trucking Associations told a federal court last week.

The groups, led by Public Citizen, used “misinterpretations, non sequiturs, statements torn from context, unpreserved arguments, and conclusory assertions backed by only occasional — and misleading — citations to actual data,” ATA said in its brief, which defended the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in the interest groups’ lawsuit challenging the 11-hour day and 34-hour restart provisions.

More about the HOS Ruling from CDL Life

More about Trucking Industry Regulation from CDL Life

FMCSA’s decision to preserve the 11-hour day “did not result from the application of a faulty legal standard,” ATA told the court. The agency used proper discretion in concluding that any safety benefits of a 10-hour driving day would be offset by the cost of losses in productivity, the group said.

Find out what Public Citizen and the Truck Safety Coalition had as a response to the ATA, and what the next steps are in the legal process at Transport Topics.

Sign up for the CDLLife Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list and get today's top trucking news delivered to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.